Main > Main Forum

2005 BYOAC Tokens: General dicsussion.

Pages: << < (19/28) > >>

Pixelhugger:

In thinking about it, most coins seem to have the most identifying info on front and related but less specific information on back. If we are going to have a front an back thread, it probably makes sense to have design guidelines so we have front like and back like submissions. Otherwise, I think Kremmit is right there wouldn't be any sense separating them.

Maybe the "front" should have BYOAC or a BYOAC logo while the back could have a control or arcade related theme? That way it would feel a bit more legitimate.. if BYOAC appears on the front and differently on the back it'd be a bit weird no?

DrewKaree:

I'm going to require several hundred absentee ballots ;D

Dougmeister:

Are brass and nickel the only options to consider for the new tokens?

Chris:


--- Quote from: Dougmeister on May 11, 2005, 08:09:02 am ---Are brass and nickel the only options to consider for the new tokens?

--- End quote ---
The only other options the manufacturer has are aluminum, which are probably too light to work properly in the mechs, and red brass, which nearly doubles the cost.

Santoro:


--- Quote from: Pixelhugger on May 10, 2005, 11:16:27 pm ---In thinking about it, most coins seem to have the most identifying info on front and related but less specific information on back. If we are going to have a front an back thread, it probably makes sense to have design guidelines so we have front like and back like submissions. Otherwise, I think Kremmit is right there wouldn't be any sense separating them.

Maybe the "front" should have BYOAC or a BYOAC logo while the back could have a control or arcade related theme? That way it would feel a bit more legitimate.. if BYOAC appears on the front and differently on the back it'd be a bit weird no?

--- End quote ---

Agree with the group on this sentiment. I will put some more guidelines in the instructions.

Pages: << < (19/28) > >>

Go to full version