| Main > Main Forum |
| 2005 BYOAC Tokens: General dicsussion. |
| << < (19/28) > >> |
| Pixelhugger:
In thinking about it, most coins seem to have the most identifying info on front and related but less specific information on back. If we are going to have a front an back thread, it probably makes sense to have design guidelines so we have front like and back like submissions. Otherwise, I think Kremmit is right there wouldn't be any sense separating them. Maybe the "front" should have BYOAC or a BYOAC logo while the back could have a control or arcade related theme? That way it would feel a bit more legitimate.. if BYOAC appears on the front and differently on the back it'd be a bit weird no? |
| DrewKaree:
I'm going to require several hundred absentee ballots ;D |
| Dougmeister:
Are brass and nickel the only options to consider for the new tokens? |
| Chris:
--- Quote from: Dougmeister on May 11, 2005, 08:09:02 am ---Are brass and nickel the only options to consider for the new tokens? --- End quote --- The only other options the manufacturer has are aluminum, which are probably too light to work properly in the mechs, and red brass, which nearly doubles the cost. |
| Santoro:
--- Quote from: Pixelhugger on May 10, 2005, 11:16:27 pm ---In thinking about it, most coins seem to have the most identifying info on front and related but less specific information on back. If we are going to have a front an back thread, it probably makes sense to have design guidelines so we have front like and back like submissions. Otherwise, I think Kremmit is right there wouldn't be any sense separating them. Maybe the "front" should have BYOAC or a BYOAC logo while the back could have a control or arcade related theme? That way it would feel a bit more legitimate.. if BYOAC appears on the front and differently on the back it'd be a bit weird no? --- End quote --- Agree with the group on this sentiment. I will put some more guidelines in the instructions. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |