Main > Everything Else
Half-Life 2!
TalkingOctopus:
--- Quote from: teef two on November 25, 2004, 07:35:25 pm ---[old git rant mode]
Just one question -
--- End quote ---
SOAPboy:
--- Quote from: teef two on November 25, 2004, 07:35:25 pm ---[old git rant mode]
Just one question -
--- End quote ---
Buddabing:
--- Quote ---Oh, and a tip for people playing through, every time you see the original half-life symbol there's some sort of "easter egg" there with information about what is going on, or a Gman sighting (Or so I am told).
--- End quote ---
I just get ammo packs, health and batteries in the lambda-marked areas, but I'm playing it on easy. I still am finding it pretty hard at times.
I have been struggling with the game's "stuttering" issues. It's distracting.
GGKoul:
--- Quote from: Buddabing on November 26, 2004, 09:37:20 am ---
--- Quote ---
I have been struggling with the game's "stuttering" issues. It's distracting.
--- End quote ---
Theres a new HL2 patch that fixes the stuttering issue
--- End quote ---
shmokes:
To each his own. I understand that technically the longer the game, the better the value and so on. But I don't want my games to last 40 hours. I have a very limited amount of time to spend playing video games and as it is there are too many great games that I desperately want to play but can't. I'm still playing through the first Splinter Cell and #3 is just around the corner. I've never even seen Viewtiful Joe in action. I haven't played a RTS on the PC in years in spite of some apparent masterpieces like Rome: Total War.
Anyway, when I start a game I like to finish it. I feel ripped off if I only get 8 or 10 hours out of a game (if I payed $50 for it), but anything over than that is perfectly fine with me if the quality is there.
I mean, imagine if all movies were 10 or 12 hours long. Even if they were great from beginning to end, there is a downside to it.