Main > Everything Else
Around 100,000 Iraqi dead
DrewKaree:
Here's a link for everyone, but it's not for the weak.
Dexter, what is on the other end of that link is a strong dose of reality. It will probably send you into convulsions. You may not want to click it, or at least cover your screen and keyboard with plastic before viewing it. I'm afraid the amount of spittle flying forth as you struggle to validate Sadaam and his actions and foist further blame on Bush may short something out.
http://varifrank.com/archives/2004/10/blood_red_fury_1.php
I know, it's not the same number as your 'state-run non-partisan media" made in their factless accusation, but it's hard to fit it all in the pictures so you can count....although getting past 21 seems as if it may be quite a challenge. ;D
Santoro:
Watch out. MrC will be here accusing you of exploiting the dead.
patrickl:
It's just like when Clinton said he hadn't had sex with "that woman". He lied. If he had just said he had sex there would not have been a big issue.
In this case Bush said Saddam was a threat to the world (or more specifically the US), Saddam was co-responsible for 9/11 attacks (by helping al-qaida) and he housed huge stockpiles of WMD that he would give to his terrorist friends freely. So with those claims he convinced the American people it was justified to start a war. In fact of course none of those claims were true, so he lied. Now he tries to spin it so that he went in there to help the people of Iraq just like Clinton tried to claim oral sex isn't sex. BS!
Santoro:
The difference is that the world thought Iraq had WMDs. It wasn't a lie, it was the best we all knew at the time.
Clinton outright lied from the start.
Nice try though. :)
Dexter:
--- Quote from: DrewKaree on November 01, 2004, 09:02:14 pm ---I'm afraid the amount of spittle flying forth as you struggle to validate Sadaam and his actions and foist further blame on Bush may short something out.
--- End quote ---
Please point me to one instance where I have tried to validate Saddam and his actions. I haven't, so why would I do it now? I don't speak in favour of mass murderers, be it Saddam OR Bush.