Main > Everything Else
1000 Reasons not to vote for GW
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote ---I'm predicting, right here, that unless we DON'T see monumental voting fraud, Kerry will lose.
--- End quote ---
You know what, you righty-tighties need to get your own arguments. Stealing elections, stealing stock holders money, workers pensions....now arguments. Have you no shame? Forget it...I know the answer to that.
Please point me to one single instance where attempted voting fraud by democrats can be shown in the run-up to the 2004 elections.
Here's a recent attempt by a Republican, more to surely follow. You support these vile undemocratic, haters of America. Not me.
Republican Sec. of State in Ohio attempts to throw out new voter registrations from democratic areas.
"In the final days before the registration deadline Ken Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of State, has ordered the local election boards to send out new applications to applicants who have submitted registrations on the wrong paper. The ostensible reason for this order is to insure that the applications can make it through the postal system without being damaged. The Secretary didn't point to any examples of voters who were stupid enough to mail regular weight paper as a postcard, nor did he cite examples of complaints from the Postal Service that this has been a problem. Never mind also that the applications he wants thrown out have already been delivered to the election boards safely."
shmokes:
Kerry is so going to lose. I wish it were about voting fraud, but mainly it's because he's a poor candidate. Look at the numbers Curmudgeon. Don't look to the debates to swing things our way. It takes more than intelligence and speaking skills to win a debate. Look how Al Gore (certainly Kerry's intellectual superior) fared against Bush.
We're going to lose. It'll be close in the popular vote, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's an electoral-vote landslide. I give Bush at least 100 electoral votes on Kerry. It's discusting.
DrewKaree:
--- Quote from: mr.Curmudgeon on September 27, 2004, 08:12:07 pm ---Please point me to one single instance where attempted voting fraud by democrats can be shown in the run-up to the 2004 elections.
--- End quote ---
Now, you don't know the election laws in Wisconsin, but if you're concerned with actually finding out how these two stories relate, I'm sure you'll look it up.
LINK Here's one, for starters...yeah, they didn't delve into the party affiliations of these students...but the next link is by the guy who DID do investigation into it LINK
LINK since he's the only one reporting on this in WI, he gets TWO links...it won't matter to the left anyway LINK
LINK here you go. Go ahead protest away. LINK
Oh, and for good measure
LINK a snippet re: the 2000 election fraud LINK
LINK and more instances of stuff gone wrong LINK
LINK This one's for right wingers only...lefty heads may explode upon reading LINK
LINK A little something that acknowledges the funding that hasn't happened...I'm sure you'll focus on this instead of the rest of what ZOGBY has to say...you know, the poll guy BOTH parties point to? LINK
And lastly LINK and this one posts BOTH sides and the charges of vote fraud. THIS is probably the one you'll want to look at MrC...then you won't have to answer the charges brought up by the other links I bring up LINK
In my state specifically, a democratic voter registration drive turned in several thousand registrations without proper identification. Lest you think you can blow this off, the "proper identification" is referring to "ANY IDENTIFICATION. After the regs have been turned in, BY LAW they have to be accepted, and BY LAW those with MISSING ID can now obtain absentee ballots, even though their registrations are NOT VALID.
To top it all off, the program has been run by a person who attempted to defraud the state of WI by running in an election where she was ineligible. The democratic D.A. offered her the option of resigning her position (in which the OTHER democrat got the position) or go to jail.
You can try to slice it any way you want, but the fact is a person who would be in jail if they were prosecuted for the crime of attempting election fraud is now running voter registration programs and submitting registrations in clear violation of the ONLY REQUIREMENT of my state.
I don't expect you, MrC, to care, since you feel it's in the best interests of the country, no matter the means, but for those who care, and to whom 1+1=2, it's as simple as connecting the dots. In Wisconsin, a swing state, Democrats are leading the charge in attempting to submit fraudulent votes, and did so in the last election. The non-prosecution by the Liberal D.A. has shown them that they can do whatever they wish, as the 2000 voter fraud that happened across the street from the local news station didn't get any play until Joe Camcorder walked into their station and PLAYED THE FRIGGEN TAPE FOR THEM...mysteriously, the story wasn't commented on by the other two stations in town.
As I stated before, UNLESS liberals commit vote fraud, Kerry will lose.
fredster:
Shmokes,
Whoa dude. Have you given up the sword when the going is tough? Do you believe you are right? Then fight man, fight!
The country is polarized. It could go either way man. Don't let a daily poll stop you from your beliefs. It goes beyond polls man. Come on dude.
I'm from TN Shmokes. Al Gore was our senator. He ran for office here. I have to say that if you really have seen gore in action, well, he was underwhelming. Kerry comes off a lot better than gore. I wouldn't say that Kerry is intellectually inferior to gore at all.
Bush cannot be underestimated. He is a very educated man. He may not be as articulate in every setting as people would like, but he is not as inept as the left would like to believe. Historically, the left likes to make fun of Republican Presidents. Think back of the left's portrail of Republican Presidents. Bush 1 was a "wimp", Regan was a "bad actor / idiot", Ford was "clumsy", and of course, Nixon was a "crook". (you lefties can believe what you want about any of them, but it doesn't matter this year).
Nobody has said a Republican was smart since Lincoln. Well, maybe Esienhower, maybe. It's the Left's way of feeling better about themselves and their loss. They like to think losing was a lucky shot or something.
MrC - how about JFK and voter fraud - http://www.adversity.net/florida/Frame_Fla_Stories/Kennedy_Daley_1960.htm
Shmokes, let me help you get fired back up man. You are kinda down.
Bush will go down as the most courageous president in modern history. While Clinton tried to negotiate a peace talk and work through the UN, Bush took the bull by the horns and solved the problem.
Do you agree that he's the best man for our new century Shmokes??
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote from: fredster on September 28, 2004, 12:03:28 am ---...and of course, Nixon was a "crook".
--- End quote ---
hehe...quotes! It really takes a lot for you guys on the right to hold one of your own accountable. Thank god Nixon didn't get a blowjob.