Main > Software Forum
No Name Mame slower than Reg. Mame?
JoeB:
I haven't noticed any slowdowns on my 2.4Ghz machine.. ;D
TheGatesofBill:
Yea, I run a 2.5GHz Pentium 4, so I really can't check for slowdowns and such myself.
Magnet_Eye:
Well, its a fact. Today i simply went into Mamewah and changed my emulator executable to mame instead of noname mame, and i tried out games like mortal kombat and world class bowling, etc which used to work fine for me, and sure enough they worked again no problem. NO NAME MAME is totally slower than regular MAME. I don't know why, but it is true.
Oh well, i am back to reg. mame again.
GatesofBull..maybe you can make it better?
;D
TheGatesofBill:
Anyone compare the speed with Analog+ yet?
Todd H:
I'm downloading Mame Analog as we speak. As soon as I compare them I'll get back with you.
Edit: Looks like Mame Analog shows slowdown on my machine as well. :(