Main > Software Forum

mame,mame,mame....

Pages: (1/2) > >>

blue:

With all these different version of mame floating around which is the best one? ???

Right now i'm using Mame32 v81 (i think)....

Lilwolf:

depends on what you do..

mame32 sucks in an arcade cabinet.

I would say the best overall solution is this

good frontend (many good ones)
NoNameMame
all other emulators.



blue:

So NoNameMame is you answer... I was going to take a look at NoName, but i can't seem to find the link for it here...

My mame system isn't in a cab, just connected to my T.V. So i'm looking for something with a good simple GUI so my friends can use it without bugging me...

bigmoe:

No Name MAME

It's developer, theGatesofBill, is active on this board, and there are a couple different active threads on it right now.

I personally think an FE like MAMEWah will take a little more time to set up than MAME32 (like, 15-20 minutes for a basic usable setup, as I recall), but I think is easier to use in the end.

b

Minwah:


--- Quote from: bigmoe on May 18, 2004, 02:25:24 pm ---No Name MAME
I personally think an FE like MAMEWah will take a little more time to set up than MAME32 (like, 15-20 minutes for a basic usable setup, as I recall), but I think is easier to use in the end.

--- End quote ---

I am biased of course but I think this is a popular misconception.  *Anyone* can setup MAMEWAH (for basic MAME use) in literaly less than 3 minutes (including installation), and not even using Stuzzas tips or David Butler's MAMEWAH Setup:

All of the settings in MAMEWAH are preset for MAME, all you need do is enter the Emulator Executable (eg c:\mame\mame.exe) and assuming you use standard roms & snap folders (99% of users seem to) everything else will be ready to go.  Of course if you want to make a layout, setup screensavers, play mp3's etc. then time adds up.....

Pages: (1/2) > >>

Go to full version