AFAIK it's technically the R9 290/290X (later refreshed and renamed 390/390X but w/out analogue), but the ridiculous size and power consumption make it less interesting than the more recent and only slightly less powerful R9 380/380X which still requires a decent PSU and either two 6pin or one 6+2pin (or 8 not sure) connector.
Analogue disappeared from the RX and Vega series. Though some earlier models like the R7 370 dropped it too, actually it's related to the GCN generation rather than the name of the series, GCN 2 and 3 cards usually have an analogue out (VGA or DVI-I) while I haven't seen any on GCN 4rd gen.
For having tried a variety of AMD from entry R7 to 380X, and I also have an RX 570, let me tell you that the benefit for GM is not necessarily where you'd expect;
A more powerful GPU will not allow you to "just increase frame_delay" like a significantly faster CPU would, rather the greater GPU power will allow you to more easily maintain the frame_delay level you already had, while you are using GM with a high resolution display (LCD etc) and using image enhancements like HLSL, overlays etc on top of it.
In practice the difference it makes is only about 1 step of frame_delay...
And that's it, a powerful AMD GPU that still features analogue-out only makes sense for the intended versatility of a setup, meaning it'll be good both for CRT and LCD (although the benefit for lcd is subtle as i've explained)
For a CRT-only setup it doesn't seem to be that useful, there you only need a bit of juice for super resolutions, but not so crazy as to go for a beefy R9 as far as I know.