| Main > Everything Else |
| Avengers: Infinity War |
| << < (10/11) > >> |
| Vigo:
Another reason for the hulk buster is that it was also one suit that Bruce Banner helped design. Bruce was more scared than anyone of hurting innocents when going hulk, so making the suit was also Bruce's pet project. While it wasn't meant for him to wear, it is probably safe to assume it is the one suit where he fully understood the controls and features. |
| Malenko:
--- Quote from: DrakeTungsten on May 15, 2018, 03:59:53 pm ---Considering that super-heroing comes down to tussling with powerful humanoids more often than anything else (an inventory of specialized suits does not negate this) I would expect that the every-day armor would be closer to the Hulkbuster design than anything else. But it's just a movie. It doesn't need a reason other than it looks cool. I was just curious if there was some other justification. --- End quote --- Yeap that's why the Army uses drones the size of Apache choppers, cause over sized is always the best approach. |
| DrakeTungsten:
More proof that quoting somebody has no bearing on how much you listened to them. Looks like I was wrong. It isn't just a movie. It is also yet another opportunity for a high-stakes ego game, as nearly everything seems to be with you. I realized a possible flaw with my premise. I don't know enough about the MCU to know if it would be applicable or not, but if it is, I was looking forward to conceding it to you or anybody else, just for the change of pace of not dealing with a strawman. Of course that was too optimistic. You're a ---smurfing--- hopeless coward. Sure, mal, I clearly said there is no scenario in which bigger is not better, and your mockery taught me a valuable lesson. Thanks! |
| Malenko:
--- Quote from: DrakeTungsten on May 17, 2018, 11:54:12 am ---More proof that quoting somebody has no bearing on how much you listened to them. Looks like I was wrong. It isn't just a movie. It is also yet another opportunity for a high-stakes ego game, as nearly everything seems to be with you. I realized a possible flaw with my premise. I don't know enough about the MCU to know if it would be applicable or not, but if it is, I was looking forward to conceding it to you or anybody else, just for the change of pace of not dealing with a strawman. Of course that was too optimistic. You're a ---smurfing--- hopeless coward. Sure, mal, I clearly said there is no scenario in which bigger is not better, and your mockery taught me a valuable lesson. Thanks! --- End quote --- Any reply is a lose - lose, if I explain myself to allow you to better comprehend what I meant then I'm back tracking. If I ignore you then you call me an elitist ---uvula---. Merely typing a reply that re-enforces that bigger isn't better in a real world example and suddenly its a "high stakes ego game". The suits aren't all Hulk buster sized because in the source material the suit is human sized, hence Iron Man not Iron "something bigger than a man." If you'd like some Cinematic Universe examples, a larger suit wouldnt be any more beneficial with Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, Loki, Killian, AntMan (in Ant or Giant Man mode), Zemo, Dormammu, etc These are just examples where a bigger suit would either be less effective, no different, or overkill. Appreciate the troll bait and name-calling, but I that's just not my cup of tea. |
| Vigo:
--- Quote from: DrakeTungsten on May 17, 2018, 11:54:12 am ---It is also yet another opportunity for a high-stakes ego game, as nearly everything seems to be with you. --- End quote --- "High-Stakes Ego Game" :laugh2: Somebody watches too much cable news. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |