Hi,
I've off and on been wanting to build a mame/arcade cabinet. I would really like to base it on the defender cabinet, and thought I'd lucked out and found one that someone had converted for around $100. Unfortunately, I was informed today that it was already sold. You snooze, you lose, I guess (although, I wish he'd taken it down off of craigslist if it was sold.)
Anyway, I'm back to the idea of making the cabinet from scratch. I've found plans from a couple of different places:
https://www.classicarcadecabinets.com/defender.html
http://www.arcaderestoration.com/Articles/1/Restoration+Data/36/Defender+Dimensions.aspx
http://jakobud.com/cabinetPlans.php
I really like the idea of using the plans off classicarcadecabinets.com, but there's a huge disclaimer about the plans no likely being accurate. The one from arcaderestorations.com apparently came from the guy making measurements of his own cabinet, and are pretty close to the ones on classicarcadecabinets.com as well. The ones on jakobud.cmo are fine, but lack a lot of detail when it comes to the inside of the cabinet.
One pretty big difference between the plans on classicarcadecabinets.com and arcaderestorations.com is that the classicarcadecabinets.com plans state 1/2" plywood, while the arcaderestorations.com plans state 3/4" plywood.
How thick was the actual plywood used in the defender cabinet?
Does anyone know of a "definitive" set of plans/schematics for the defender cabinet?
I'm probably going to make some minor changes from the original design anyway, but I'd like to start with the original design and go from there if possible.
Thanks!
Sorry for being late to the party. I don't log in as often as I would like.
I just wanted to comment on the plans from classicarcadecabinets.com and I how I do the accuracy and warning for the website.
1. The plans should use 3/4" plywood, which is listed in the notes at the top of the page. The plans do identify the back door as being cut from 1/2" plywood. I apologize if this was misleading in the plans. I will make this more clear when I update the website.
2. The plans were purchased from a CNCer and I had permission to post them on the website. I believe them to be very accurate. With that said, I am extremely paranoid about quality (former Quality Manger earlier in my career) and unless I have external verification or I have measured the cabinet myself, all of the plans will have the red bars. When I purchased the plans, I was very conflicted if I should hold off on posting without verification...... and this was the solution I came up with. If anyone can verify the measurements, please let me know.
3. My basic scoring is as below.
Scores with Red Bars are believed to be good and are usually provided by CNCer. The plans look good / detailed, but have not been verified by someone else as accurate.
Scores in the 80% range are of high quality build plans. ... but have not been verified by being used to build a cabinet. The plans may be perfect...just not sure. Low 80s are usually missing something, like a back door. High 80s usually are extremely detailed and will also have all if the drilling for the cabinet as well (for example, a Taito cabinet held together with brackets)
Scores in the 90s are of good build plans that ave been used to build a cabinet successfully. Likewise, low 90s are sometimes missing something like a back door or wooden coin box. Higher 90s scores are perfect copies and should be indistinguishable from the original, down to internal blocking. A 100% score would be the original blueprint / build plans from the manufacturer.
Overall, if I have any concerns about the plans, they don't get posted...even if supplied by a CNCer. I have a Gauntlet cabinet that falls into this category at the moment.
If you have any questions, please reach out. I am occasionally on here, but the website would probably be quickest.
Thanks
Brian