| Main > Main Forum |
| Some arcade legality questions |
| << < (7/11) > >> |
| pbj:
Most pointless debate ever. NOBODY CARES. The companies do NOTHING to stop it. :cheers: |
| Hoopz:
--- Quote from: Mr_Numbers on February 07, 2014, 01:28:07 am ---irregardless --- End quote --- Not a word. |
| JDFan:
--- Quote from: Hoopz on February 07, 2014, 10:34:07 am --- --- Quote from: Mr_Numbers on February 07, 2014, 01:28:07 am ---irregardless --- End quote --- Not a word. --- End quote --- Actually it is often accepted as a word and is listed in many dictionaries ! According to the WIKI : --- Quote ---In the last twenty-five years, irregardless has become a common entry in dictionaries and usage reference books, although commonly marked as substandard or dialect. It appears in a wide range of dictionaries including Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1961, repr. 2002),[4] The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology (1988), The American Heritage Dictionary (Second College Edition, 1991),[5] Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary (2001), and Webster's New World College Dictionary (Fourth Edition, 2004).[6] The definition in most dictionaries is simply listed as regardless (along with the note nonstandard, or similar). Merriam–Webster even states "Use regardless instead." --- End quote --- |
| DaveMMR:
--- Quote from: JDFan link=topic=137566.msg1420308#msg1420308 --- Actually it is often accepted as a word and is listed in many dictionaries ! --- End quote --- The same dictionaries that added the likes of "D'oh" and "twerk" and "selfie" to their pages? Dictionaries are only a mirror of our language, however proper or improper. Exercise discretion using those words in formal conversation (e.g. job interviews, etc.). |
| Malenko:
|
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |