Main > Main Forum
New Intel G3220 Socket 1150 Haswell Processor Mame
<< < (3/12) > >>
s_busby_uk:
Would be amazing if you could - I'd like to be able to run it with all the bells and whistles ideally.
nimda79:
Here's the benchmark results on my G3220 running at Stock 3.0Ghz vs e8400 running at 3.6Ghz overclock
Game      G3220(@3.0Ghz)      e8400 (@3.6Ghz)
blitz               181                          166
gauntleg       219                          221
gradius4       142                          125
propcycl        135                          135
scud             155                           86
starsldr        100                           58

e8400 benchmarks attained from:
http://www.mameui.info/Bench/Bench.htm

Attached is screenshot of setup with benchmarks (Note: dolphin and radikalb did not run because of bad dump on my box)

s_busby_uk as soon as I have a chance I'll get you a video or something of Hyperspin running.
stripe4:
I'm curious about the MAME version you used to benchmark G3220. Was it also 0.141? I ask you this because performance regressions (and their subsequent fixes) are nothing out of the ordinary in MAME, here's an example:
http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=309357&page=16&view=expanded&sb=5&o=&fpart=1&vc=1

The huge difference in scud and starsldr results was the one that made me suspicious. If MAME versions really do not match, can you please rerun the tests using 0.141?
nimda79:

--- Quote from: stripe4 on January 29, 2014, 04:12:22 am ---I'm curious about the MAME version you used to benchmark G3220. Was it also 0.141? I ask you this because performance regressions (and their subsequent fixes) are nothing out of the ordinary in MAME, here's an example:
http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=309357&page=16&view=expanded&sb=5&o=&fpart=1&vc=1

The huge difference in scud and starsldr results was the one that made me suspicious. If MAME versions really do not match, can you please rerun the tests using 0.141?

--- End quote ---

You are right, I tested mine on .149
I'll compile up .141 x64 for it and run again to get more "accurate" comparison.
I more wanted to show it can handle the workloads more than anything but I'll get you the results.


--- Quote from: ark_ader on January 29, 2014, 03:54:18 am ---Like I said pretty pathetic for a Haswell processor.  ::)

--- End quote ---

Thank you, Captain Obvious  :applaud:
Still, this shows that it handles the more demanding games as I stated (and you laughed at).   ;D
I'd be curious how the AMD A8-5500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor compares to this, as you have recommended it to someone back in December.
http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,135997.msg1406224.html#msg1406224
nimda79:

--- Quote from: stripe4 on January 29, 2014, 04:12:22 am ---I'm curious about the MAME version you used to benchmark G3220. Was it also 0.141? I ask you this because performance regressions (and their subsequent fixes) are nothing out of the ordinary in MAME, here's an example:
http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=309357&page=16&view=expanded&sb=5&o=&fpart=1&vc=1

The huge difference in scud and starsldr results was the one that made me suspicious. If MAME versions really do not match, can you please rerun the tests using 0.141?

--- End quote ---

Well just as I feared...my .149 rom set is too much different, so .141 won't run. I guess I'll have to install a second drive in my e8400 box and install Windows 7 x64 to give the full comparison. Bonus is that it will be stock clock speeds so it will be a true 1:1 comparison vs the benchmarks I linked to that have an OC'ed e8400.

Ark_Ader, would you like a blood sample or something? Holy crap dude. I proved it runs the games that drown most systems and you still have a hard on for flaming. I'm starting to doubt you are 45 as your profile states, due to the immaturity of your comments. As I see it you have 3 options: (1) Act your age (2) admit defeat (3) stop posting flame-bait comments

By the above comments, I see I am not the only one annoyed by this behavior. I really hope a mod sees this crap and puts you and your attitude where it belongs, post-hell and perma-ban. Add value or GTFO.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version