Again, shponglefan, that just isn't the case. The governor on the show was blatantly evil to the point of where he was creepy to listen to. There wasn't an ounce of charisma or leadership ability in the guy, it's just due to poor writing, everyone around him acted like he had those qualities.
Tyreese doesn't bother me one bit. I need some sort of character development to be invested in a character and quite frankly, in both the comics and on the show, he's a throw-away antagonist that acts as filler between the major arcs. Don't worry, he'll be gone soon.
How does Rick contradict himself by saying there is power in numbers and then banish her? His actions kind of confirm that point. There aren't a handful in the prison at this point... it's around 70 people. The original group is in the minority.
Making her leave, even though it won't be a popular decision is one of the smartest moves he's done in a while. Look back to Shane... that's how his evil started.... doing horrible things and justifying them as necessary for survival.
I would also like to point out that nobody I know, nor did the panel on talking dead, address the elephant in the room. Her killing those people early makes no logical sense... it doesn't hinder the spread of disease one bit. First off, most illnesses are in their contagious phase before symptoms appear..... if they are hacking and coughing on death's door it's too late.... they've already infected anyone around them when they first caught it. Secondly the two people had already been isolated from the group, and they would have been dead in a few hours anyway, even if it did spread while they were showing symptoms the likelihood of it spreading further was slim.
Long story short, she made a bad call. Now burning the bodies was smart, but murdering the people instead of giving them a fighting chance was extremely dumb. Yeah it had an unbelievably slim chance of reducing the risk of infection, but think of all the other problems it caused. That's some Shane logic she had going on.
Then she gets those poor hippies killed. It was obvious that they were worthless in a fight, but she saw them as expendable. She's been acting weird ever since the season started, and if that's the path they are taking an otherwise interesting character, I'm glad they are removing her early. The change in personality doesn't make any sense either. The only thing bad that's happened to her recently was when she got trapped in the prison but that was EARLY last season. She should have shown symptoms of a heel turn earlier on.
What's with this weird alcoholic angle they've shoe-horned in btw? First off, we've seen this guy in two episodes, so we have no vested interest in him. Secondly Daryl has known him only slightly longer so why does he care so much? Lastly I think considering the world they live in being a drunk would be the norm, not the exception.
I mean I get what they are TRYING to pull off. Both Daryl and Merle had substance abuse problems, it's established backstory. The problem is it's backstory we never saw, so as viewers we can't relate. I mean unless they do a flashback episode with Daryl getting someone killed due to his addiction to pills/meth/whatever, there isn't any emotional payoff. Even then it's a played out cliché that they should avoid.
The thing that has me interested right now is Hershel. He's getting far too much screen time, so something bad is going to happen. I don't think they are going to kill him off, but it could go either way honestly. What has me worried is even though they have sick people that could die any minute all in one place they are STILL not locking this people in individual cells. That's just sheer idiocy.