Main > Everything Else

Framing a wall: idiot edition

<< < (10/11) > >>

TopJimmyCooks:
Excuse me for getting all X2 on this but some of you have the wrong idea about building permits.


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 03:27:45 pm ---I'm a big fan of safety, so if you need to get things inspected for safety's sake I'm all for it, but imho permits are a scam created partially to make a new industry and partially to pass the blame of an accident away from the utility company. 

--- End quote ---

Not true.  I'm a student of building codes and they are primarily oriented towards safety, specifically Avoiding structural collapse, can't get out of the building during a fire, or you get electrocuted.  they don't protect quality except as a by product. 


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 03:27:45 pm ---Example:  . . . .  The house with the 100 year old wiring... it's still chugging along. 
This isn't a crazy over the top example either.... I know a person who was in a situation like this.

--- End quote ---

This is an example of (I think) one of the great things about the USA.  Once you're built out you're done with most regulatory, until you make an alteration.  the same applies with zoning which is why you still see eyesores in areas that have had zoning ordinances for many years.  Now, if you have 2 fires in your old house with knob and tube bare wiring still in use, they might condemn it for the safety of the neighbors.  but in almost all cases, the government tries to stay out of your house when possible. 


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 03:27:45 pm ---My point is, if you think the point of inspections is to ensure you have a safe home think again, the point usually is to give a GC trying to supplement his income some extra cash and to make sure the electric company doesn't get sued.

--- End quote ---

Although the contracting lobby has some input on building codes, its almost always pushing to make them as weak and liberal as possible, not stringent to sell more building materials.  the general view is the cheaper it is to build the more we will be hired to do it.  the point of codes is safety, with a newer secondary goal of making buildings energy efficient.  My brother just ran into a radon abatement issue.  Radon abatement contractors didn't exist before someone figured out that radon causes health issues.  the issue came up, legislation happened, contractors moved to provide work that meets the code.  in that order.  homebuilders aren't lurking around trying to find ways to charge people more.  they fight against that, generally. 


Gonna keep addressing Howard here although others have spewed wrongness in this thread as well:


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 04:31:07 pm ---Yeah I think a lot of the problem lies in the fact that "city planners" or "councilmen" write up this stuff and they don't have a clue what they are talking about in regards to the history of home building. 

--- End quote ---
In almost all cases wrong.  West Virginia uses IBC 2009 building code, just like most us states currently.  it is a code developed by an international committee of experts and practitioners.  Not your friendly local city councilman.  Some states make minor exceptions or additions for their local conditions.  City planners may have a more direct influence on Zoning, which is a different thing than building codes, but I'm well qualified to hold forth on Zoning as well if anyone wants to have a go. 


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 04:31:07 pm ---I think the best example I can give is the fact that modern structural codes are based upon modern lumber and don't make exceptions for old lumber. 

My grandma's house is made out of 100+ old lumber.  First of it uses REAL sized lumber.  A 2x4 is actually 2 inches by 4 inches ect....  Secondly it comes from old growth trees....
 . . .
 and 1.5 x 3.5 new pine studs that are so flimsy I can drive a screw through them with a manual screw driver. 

--- End quote ---

This is dead wrong.  IBC certainly allows for and covers literally archaic techniques and materials for wood framing.  It covers heavy timber framing, skip sheathing, wood shingle roofs and a bunch of other stuff you don't really see done much anymore unless someone is specifically going for historical accuracy. 

Modern lumber is smaller than old full dimension lumber, but it's better graded/more quality control and you are allowed to use full dimension if you have it.  That's not to say you can't buy Low Grade lumber today, but the code sets the grade minimum (#2, stud, etc.).  Those markings stamped on the studs mean something.


--- Quote from: Howard_Casto on July 09, 2013, 04:31:07 pm ---It's one of those deals where they should really just make it really hard to get an inspectors license, ensuring only knowledgeable people get in and each house should be inspected on a case by case basis instead of going down a list of pointless technicalities.  Of course that has it's own problems, so I'm not even sure if a reasonable solution exists.

--- End quote ---

In my experience this is already true.  inspectors have to be trained and licenced under IBC code.  You can also always get stuff excepted or specially reviewed.  usually you go in, tell them what you're trying to do, and they'll either tell you they'll review your plan and inspect the work, or they'll tell you to get an engineer/architect to seal the design and then maybe a 3rd party inspector, so they are covered.  They are respectful of their limits and may pass the buck, but they are also civil SERVANTs and their desire is not to keep people from doing stuff.  just from doing dangerous stuff.

I still feel like the OP's basement wall has nothing to do with life safety and he can frame it and hang it without a permit reasonably, if not legally.  I could respond to a lot more but I've got to go devise ways to gyp my clients more efficiently and quickly by exploiting current municipal regulatory loopholes!?!

Vigo:

--- Quote from: MonMotha on July 10, 2013, 01:17:40 am ---Have you checked with your relevant city/county officials?  Many municipalities have provisions for field certification of deviations like this.  The requirements are often quite onerous as they're also/mostly intended to cover new, experimental building techniques, but if indeed your roof is "sturdier than most modern roofs", you may be able to get such a variance to the code granted to re-shingle as is.  It'll probably cost you way more in time than dollars to push through.

--- End quote ---

Well, in the end, I figured it was not worth fighting the city. From what i gathered, it would require showing up to a neighborhood hearing and making my case. I have no patience for my city. In the few short years I have been in the city, they have:

Accidentally condemned my house and tried to force me to vacate. Never found out what the mix-up was, but I had to submit way too much documentation and get it notarized for them. I also had lost my homestead status and had to reapply.

They accidentally classified my house as a rental property. I was upgrading my mailbox, and left the old one behind a locked porch for a couple weeks. Somehow a city inspector saw the old mailbox and assumed I was dividing out my mail from a subrenter's mail and changed my property classification to an illegal rental. They tried to hit me with a ton of fines, and revoked my homestead yet again. That was a 3 month fight that the city wanted to enter my home to make sure there was no second family living there. Since there was a guest bedroom, they didn't beliecve me after inspection and prompted them to do random surveillance of my home.

The city also made me get rid of my trailer. I had a trailer folded up in a corner patio area, but the city declared it was a yard parked vehicle. I lost that fight.

Then the city tried to tow my car for not having a parking permit. In reality I was the first car on the street to put on the new parking permit, but the parking enforcement officer didn't realize it and thought I was the one with an outdated permit. I had stopped him from towing, but out of spite, the guy ticketed me and I had to take off of work to show up to a hearing.

Then there is the time the city chopped down the outwald half of my trees. The city realized they could get a federal grant for "restoring" a historical home. One of the city council members, who owns a small trucking company, bought out a city block for truck parking. He found out that one of the houses he bought was a classified as historical, so he had the city buy the home without the land from him. The city decided to ship the house to an open park across the street from me. One day I came home to a couple 30 foot tall half-trees outside my house, and had to find out the story the paper the day after they drove a crumbling house down my street. Flash forward two years and that house is still crumbling and condemned, my trees haven't recovered, and I don't have that park plot across from my house anymore.

Vigo:
@topJimmyCooks

Sorry, but I really still have to agree with Howard.

As far as building code goes, I think almost all older or larger cities have their own code developed in addition to standard building codes. Where I am from, they call it an "appendix to the state adopted building code". There are chapters and chapters of city-specific codes. In my city, there are 23 chapters. They have further chapters to control "Historical" districts and houses.

In my experience the city inspector's main goal has always been to get into my business. (See my post above). I have only met one really stellar inspector in my city, and that guy was truly great at his job. Too bad for every one of him, my city has 10 cronies of the city. Most the inspectors in my city are intentionally trying to get my neighborhood, as the city has been working on ways to plow down our neighborhood to expand the hospital without an uproar. The inspector who got me on my trailer let that detail slip. There is a reason why my neighborhood had the highest foreclosure rate in the entire country a few years back. Bunch of cronies.  :angry:

Oh, and as far as "old lumber" goes. Modern lumber may have quality controls and grades to their lumber, but it is undeniable how sturdy mature wood lumber is in comparison to modern young tree lumber. I prize the 100+ year old lumber in my house, and any time I have the opportunity to take it down, I do. Simply because I want it for myself. My house is made 10 times more durable than a modern home because of that wood.

TopJimmyCooks:
Vigo:  no question you've been done in on your house.  Mostly on zoning and historical preservation isht which is, yes, very local and very annoying but not really building code related.  By the way, what city are you in?

I arfing hate hysterical preservation these days. I like nice old neighborhoods very much but the way they go about keeping them that way is draconian, the petty little napoleons, and they certainly help their friends and developers and smooth the way for their own projects.  (preservation boards are stocked with contractors, major landowners, developers and architects/engineers + rarely maybe a historian).  Good idea but too much means for corruption.  I believe you have the right to complain if they overlaid the district on you while you lived there but you should be grandfathered.  If you moved into it, you might have known better.   Any time I buy any property I check the rules for fire districts, historical, zoning, etc.  because as a GC, changing the use and altering the building, I'm going to get all the rules applied to me in spades.  The process of checking all this stuff before buying is called due diligence.  Sounds like this isn't your issue and you're trying to comply with the rules and still getting jerked around.

I've dealt with building and zoning in a lot of cities and towns throughout the southeastern us.  Very few times/places are they in your business badly like you've had to deal with.  most often, they are overworked, underpaid and do their minimum job requirements but don't look for trouble.  Some places they do look for trouble.  Two examples are Pinehurst NC and Alexandria VA.  these places have a lot of their own rulebooks. 

Any city is much worse in this regard than a rural area eg Howard's. 

I'm going to start a separate thread in EE on modern lumber v/s full dimension old growth.  Maybe.  >:D

ChadTower:

--- Quote from: Dawgz Rule on July 09, 2013, 03:32:42 pm ---Well said.  I was going to add that permits can come in handy if one has no clue as to what they are actually doing. 

--- End quote ---


This is pretty much why I went whole hog on permits for my gameroom.  I wanted to do all of the work myself and it's all for the first time.  That and I'm adding "living square footage" to the house so it needs to be building inspector approved to count.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version