Main > Everything Else

The Walking Dead - Season 3

<< < (16/19) > >>

Louis Tully:
.

Howard_Casto:
To be fair to "The King"  when the zombie apocalypse happens, I'm totally going to the zoo and getting me a Tiger.  Or maybe a Polar Bear with a saddle.  Because I mean... if the word has no rules, new rule #1 is I get a frikkin Tiger!

Howard_Casto:

--- Quote from: Vigo on April 02, 2013, 04:37:43 pm ---I thought Season 3 was an improvement from Season 2 where they spent the whole season looking for a girl who was dead in the barn the whole time. I was happy there was an actual villain this season as oppose to season two where the only danger was when somebody stupidly stormed off the farm and into the woods alone.

--- End quote ---

Maybe you were watching a different show, but the main villain in season 2 was the same main villain in season 1... namely Shane.  That cowardly, selfish, lying s.o.b. was almost as bad as the Governor.  I agree that season 3 was better though, it's just that isn't saying much. 

ChadTower:

That's one point of view.  IMO the main villain in Season 2 was Laurie.  She manipulated Shane every chance she got until he finally broke and turned on his only real friend.  Yeah, he was a flawed man, but he tried to coexist and every time he started to find peace Laurie decided to feed her own ego by destroying him all over again.

Vigo:
Daytime soap operas have more unstable and dangerous characters than Shane. An unstable character might be the beginnings of a villain, but until they hit their breaking point, it is still only group drama and waiting for things to get worse. Otherwise, season 2 was pretty much boring life on the farm waiting for Shane to really snap. Any sense of danger for the whole group was gone.

If you are going to call an dangerously unstable character a villain, then you got to call Rick in Season 3 a villain as well. He has done far more to endanger the group than Shane ever did.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version