Main > Everything Else
more
flashiv:
--- Quote from: javeryh on September 28, 2012, 09:45:45 am ---Katey Sagal is awesome. That is all.
--- End quote ---
I agree 100% :notworthy:
--- Quote from: CCM on September 29, 2012, 01:13:11 am ---
--- Quote from: pinballjim on September 28, 2012, 03:53:41 pm ---Where did I say she SHOULD not have had it done? Her body, her money.
I don't think it serves any practical purpose. Perhaps I'm wrong.
:dunno
--- End quote ---
It probably wasn't her money... Insurance companies pay for reconstruction after mastectomies.
--- End quote ---
Does trying to stop your receding hairline have any practical purpose? Nope, but damn if I'm not doing what I can to stop it anyhow! Not practical at all, but I like to keep my hair where it is as long as I can.
I agree it's her money (whether through insurance or out of her pocket), spend it how she wants.
Also Married with Children.... awesome show, watched it every week. Fiancee doesn't get it, but I still love her. ;D
BadMouth:
crackle.com has it. Theme song is missing and replaced with something else. ???
Last night I watched the episode about the Ferguson toilet. ;D
shmokes:
--- Quote from: pinballjim on September 28, 2012, 03:53:41 pm ---Where did I say she SHOULD not have had it done? Her body, her money.
I don't think it serves any practical purpose. Perhaps I'm wrong.
:dunno
--- End quote ---
You are wrong. You're wrong about cosmetic surgery never serving a practical purpose, but more fundamentally you're wrong about the meaning of vanity. Caring about your appearance doesn't make you vain. Vanity speaks to excess. I doubt that many people consider cosmetic reconstruction after a disfiguring surgery to be excessive.
leapinlew:
Married with Children to a philosophical discussion on Vanity.
Well played Mr. Jim.
pinballjim:
--- Quote from: shmokes on September 29, 2012, 03:23:06 pm --- I doubt that many people consider cosmetic reconstruction after a disfiguring surgery to be excessive.
--- End quote ---
Except that she hasn't gone around showing her tits off in 20 years. (if someone has photographic evidence disproving this, I'd love to see it)
When she had them removed, she turned it into a mass media story.
When she had them reconstructed, it was again in the news.
This isn't like replacing a nose that got chopped off. It could have been kept private and nobody would have ever known.
Despite what Susan Komen's minions tell you, breast cancer does not need more awareness.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version