Main > Main Forum
Ultrastik 360 with Octagon Restrictor??
<< < (2/3) > >>
8BitMonk:
I recently switched my U360's to use octagonal restrictors and like it best for all around game play. Realistically because they take some time to swap you have to pick one and go with it even though it may be a bit of an compromise in one area. The octagonal (for me) is the best all around feel for all game types. If I were to pick one just for 4-way play I'd say the square restrictor in 4 way mode is modestly better then the octagonal but then it sucks for 8-way, 4-way diagonal and analog games.
mgb:
8BitMonk,
 I'm expecting some compromise either way. Right now my compromise with the JLWs is having to open the control panel in order to switch between 4-way and 8-way and of course the click of the switches.
I'm really leaning toward trying out a u360 with an octagon plate.
But man I really do love the JLWs.
Gray_Area:

--- Quote from: mgb on June 22, 2011, 06:13:23 pm ---8BitMonk,
 I expecting some compromise either way. Right now my compromise with the JLWs is having to open the control panel in order to switch between 4-way and 8-way and of course the click of the switches.
I'm really leaning toward trying out a u360 with an octagon plate.
But man I really do love the JLWs.

--- End quote ---

Just build a small 4-way game cab.

I have 8-way sticks on one rig, complemented by a U360 that I use for 4-way and diagonal games. Another rig has only U360s, and they work fine for general use. But Robotron just doesn't feel right with a U360.

I was accumulating parts for a dedicated 4-way cab, and then changed my mind. But if I was really serious about Donkey Kong and the Pacs, I would have some kind of dedicated 4-way set-up.
mgb:
I love the idea of a dedicated 4-way cab and I have the parts for building one.
Problem is I don't have the room for it.
Gray_Area:
Bartop.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version