Main > Main Forum
The current status of Ram Controls:
FrizzleFried:
--- Quote from: Rick on September 08, 2011, 12:55:44 pm ---
--- Quote from: BadMouth on September 08, 2011, 12:33:50 pm ---He's been involved from the beginning. Keep up!
--- End quote ---
I read that he's somehow involved with taking over operations - not that he was involved with Dave from the beginning of the issues. Am I incorrect?
--- End quote ---
Yes... you are incorrect. Jim Bloomquist has been attached to RAM CONTROLS since at least 2006.
Rick:
--- Quote from: FrizzleFried on September 08, 2011, 01:33:05 pm ---Yes... you are incorrect. Jim Bloomquist has been attached to RAM CONTROLS since at least 2006.
--- End quote ---
I stand corrected. Please accept my apology. I read this thread really, really, really late last night. Some of the words undoubtedly blurred together.
So, Jim gets a "Tip o' The Hat" for at least coming forward and doing something positive - credits, getting people stuff, etc - that seems to be proven by a minimal number of people in this thread, and a "Wag o' The Finger" for the deceptive nature of ... well, everything else.
Damn, and I really, really wanted to think happy thoughts about this today. GDI.
SuprSprint:
You need to go read the KLOV thread. Jim deserves a hell of a lot more than a wag of the finger. Adam/Dave still works at RAM and Jim has been funneling him thousands of dollars while lying to everyone here about it. Jim deserves a permanent ban....
Rick:
--- Quote from: pldoolittle on September 08, 2011, 02:34:50 pm ---You need to go read the KLOV thread. Jim deserves a hell of a lot more than a wag of the finger.
--- End quote ---
Oh, I didn't mention which finger, did I?
--- Quote from: pldoolittle on September 08, 2011, 02:34:50 pm ---Adam/Dave still works at RAM and Jim has been funneling him thousands of dollars while lying to everyone here about it. Jim deserves a permanent ban....
--- End quote ---
I might tend to disagree on the ban. The lying, sure. That's really, really ---smurfy---. Would I purchase anything from RAM knowing this information now? No. I'm not that type of person. There are, however, people online who do seem to be benefiting from Jim somewhat, whether that be through credits or getting their orders - whatever. Banning Jim could remove the only line of communication people who have been cheated from getting any remuneration. I would definitely go with banning offers of new business until past issues have been settled, that's for certain.
I really wanted a white knight on this one. Sad to see it's come around to this, once again.
RayB:
--- Quote from: Rick on September 08, 2011, 02:10:39 pm ---So, Jim gets a "Tip o' The Hat" for at least coming forward and doing something positive - credits, getting people stuff, etc - that seems to be proven by a minimal number of people in this thread, and a "Wag o' The Finger" for the deceptive nature of ... well, everything else.
--- End quote ---
Dude, don't even give him credit for that. It's part of any con-man's MO to ingratiate himself with the marks. Dave Adams, or whatever his real name is did the same by offering free parts and sales. (Parts he likely didn't even pay for, now that it's been revealed some Chinese companies were ripped off). Just use this site's search for threads by "DavieA", keywords "sale" and "free".
Don't be naive.