Main > Everything Else

3D televisions

<< < (12/18) > >>

Vanguard:
I read a report that said 2-12% of the population are 3D-blind.   70% sounds a little far fetched.   If the technology had that high of a reject rate, I doubt it would be considered a viable consumer feature.

SavannahLion:

--- Quote from: Gray_Area on October 14, 2010, 02:30:28 am ---The fundamentals are truly ubiquitous wireless, peripherals becoming wearables, and cloud environment liberating devices from processing demands. (D/A converters have become pretty inexpensive. The above could likely be helped along if broadcast were [still] analog.)
--- End quote ---

That's not even close to describing the fundamentals.

Frigo:

--- Quote from: pinballjim on October 14, 2010, 10:36:00 am ---Man, a couple of you should really see if NASA is hiring.  They're always looking for uncreative engineers.



--- End quote ---

I dunno, can you list "conjecture" and "speculation" as applicable skills?  ;D

ChadTower:

--- Quote from: AtomSmasher on October 10, 2010, 02:26:39 am ---So the TV will work for only one person at a time and that person has to wear something clipped to them?  How is this better then the glasses?

--- End quote ---


Don't you sit with the remote in your hand or on your chair?

Mikezilla:

--- Quote from: Gray_Area on October 14, 2010, 02:30:28 am ---These are developing - just not so much here as in Asia, where the culture is far more mobile and flexibility-minded, and where the youth have much more  involvement and say in it.

--- End quote ---

When you mean "asia" I assume you mean Japan?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version